A joint conference followed by hot tubbing – How concurrent evidence can resolve clashes of expertise
In policy and legal systems, focusing too narrowly on one discipline can lead to questionable conclusions. Tsuyoshi Hondou and Ismael Rafols introduce ‘Concurrent evidence’, as a framework to consider evidence from multiple disciplines to reach more robust decisions. Studies on transdisciplinary research (research that cuts across disciplinary and academic boundaries) often focus on how different … Continued