Notably Good Experiences with Philosophy Journals

Error message

  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in _menu_load_objects() (line 579 of /var/www/drupal-7.x/includes/menu.inc).
  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /var/www/drupal-7.x/includes/common.inc).
Published by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 30/01/2024 - 12:45am in

Tags 

Publishing, editors, philosophy, Publishing, writing

As stories of philosophy journal horror stories continue to come in, one commenter made a suggestion.

[This post was originally published on March 3, 2021. It has been reposted by request of a reader.]


[Jim Picôt, “Love Heart of Nature” (photo of shark swimming in a heart-shaped school of salmon)]

If part of the reason for sharing such stories was to possibly reveal some common problems or patterns with an important part of the world of academic philosophy, then, says Kaila Draper, “Maybe we should have a thread about really good experiences with referees and journals so that more patterns can be detected.”

Good idea!

Readers, if you’ve had a delightful, beneficial, super-efficient, caring, understanding, or even just notably good experience with a philosophy journal, please share it.

And just to get it out of the way, while we are very happy for you, “They accepted my article!” doesn’t qualify.

The post Notably Good Experiences with Philosophy Journals first appeared on Daily Nous.